December 26, 2016
The Still Hour
Spurgeon, in a very challenging sermon, True Prayer—True Power! (text, audio),
recommends a "a sweet little book":
And now to mount one step higher,
together with definite objects, fervent desires and strong faith in the
efficacy of prayer there should be—and oh may divine grace make it so
with us!—there should be mingled a realising expectation. We should be
able to count over the mercies before we have got them, believing that
they are on the road.
Reading the other day in a sweet little book, which I would commend to
the attention of you all, written by an American author who seems to
know the power of prayer thoroughly, and to whom I am indebted for many
good things—a little book called The Still Hour,
I met with a reference to a passage in the book of Daniel, the tenth
chapter I think, where, as he says, the whole machinery of prayer seems
to be laid bare. Daniel is on his knees in prayer, and Michael the
archangel come to him. He talks with him and tells him that as soon as
ever Daniel began to set his heart to understand, and to chasten
himself before God, his words were heard, and the Lord had dispatched
the angel. Then he tells him in the most business-like manner in the
world, "I should have been here before, but the Prince of Persia
withstood me; nevertheless the prince of thy nation helped me, and I am
come to comfort and instruct thee."
See now. God breathes the desire into our hearts, and as soon as the
desire is there, before we call he begins to answer. Before the words
have got half way up to heaven, while they are yet trembling on the
lip—knowing the words we mean to speak—he begins to answer them, sends
the angel; the angel comes and brings down the needed blessing. Why the
thing is a revelation if you could see it with your eyes.
October 19, 2016
The Old Road -- The Precious
Doctrines of Grace
From The Spurgeon Birthday Book:
October 15, 2016
Surprise! Universe has 2 trillion
galaxies
One of the most amazing Hubble images is of Deep Field,
which took the Hubble telescope 10 days to image... but only God's
spoken word on the 4th day to create, as if saying: By the way, "...the
stars also."
From the Online Bible:
Contrast
the foolishness of modern cosmology with the writings of the early
church father, Theophilus when he states:
“On the fourth day the luminaries came into existence. Since God has
foreknowledge, he understood the nonsense of the foolish philosophers
who were going to say that the things produced on earth came from the
stars, so that they might set God aside. In order therefore that the
truth might be demonstrated, plants and seeds came into existence
before stars. For what comes into existence later cannot cause what is
prior to it.”
From Clarke's Commentary -- 258,000 stars:
The STARS in
general are considered to be suns, similar to that in our system, each
having an appropriate number of planets moving round it; and, as these
stars are innumerable, consequently there are innumerable worlds, all
dependent on the power, protection, and providence of God. Where
the stars are in great abundance, Dr. Herschel supposes they form
primaries and secondaries, i.e., suns revolving about suns, as planets
revolve about the sun in our system. He considers that this must
be the case in what is called the milky way, the stars being there in
prodigious quantity. Of this he gives the following proof: On
August 22, 1792, he found that in forty-one minutes of time not less
than 258,000 stars had passed through the field of view in his
telescope. What must God be, who has made, governs, and supports
so many worlds!
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/oct/13/hubble-telescope-universe-galaxies-astronomy
Universe has 2 trillion galaxies, astronomers say
Hubble telescope images from
deep space were collected over 20 years to solve the puzzle of how many
galaxies the cosmos harbors
There are a dizzying 2 trillion galaxies in the universe, up to 20
times more than previously thought, astronomers reported on Thursday.
The surprising finding, based on 3D modeling of images collected over
20 years by the Hubble
Space Telescope, was published in the Astronomical Journal.
Scientists have puzzled over how many galaxies the cosmos harbors at
least since US astronomer Edwin Hubble showed in 1924 that Andromeda, a
neighboring galaxy, was not part of our own Milky Way. But even in the
era of modern astronomy, getting an accurate tally has proven difficult.
To begin with, there is only part of the cosmos where light given off
by distant objects has had time to reach Earth. The rest is effectively
beyond our reach. And even within this “observable universe”, current
technology only allows us to glimpse 10% of what is out there,
according to the new findings.
“It boggles the mind that over 90% of the galaxies in the universe have
yet to be studied,” commented Christopher Conselice of the University
of Nottingham, who led the study. “Who knows what interesting
properties we will find when we observe these galaxies with the next
generation of telescopes?” he said in a statement.
Using deep space images from Hubble, Conselice and his team
painstakingly converted them into 3D to measure the number of galaxies
at different times in the history of the universe. The analysis reached
back more than 13bn years – very near the time of the “Big Bang”
thought to have given birth to the universe.
A galaxy is a system of millions or billions or stars, held together by
gravity, with planetary systems within them. Using new mathematical
models, the astronomers were able to infer the number of “invisible”
galaxies beyond the reach of telescopes, leading to the surprising
realization that the vast majority are too faint and far away to be
seen.
When the universe was only a few billion years old, there were 10 times
as many galaxies in a given volume of space as there are today, the
findings suggest. This in turn suggests that “significant evolution
must have occurred to reduce their number through extensive merging of
systems”.
This article was amended on Friday 14 October 2016
to correct the headline, which had wrongly stated that there are 2tn
more galaxies than previously thought.
October 10, 2016
Every man who comes to Christ
shall be saved
From Free Will — A Slave
sermon by C. H. Spurgeon, December 2, 1855:
I say every man who comes to
Christ shall be saved. I can say that as a Calvinist, or as a
hyper-Calvinist, as plainly as you can say it. I have no narrower
gospel than you have; only my gospel is on a solid foundation, whereas
yours is built upon nothing but sand and rottenness. "Every man that
cometh shall be saved, for no man cometh to me except the Father draw
him."
"But," says one, "suppose all the world should come, would Christ
receive them?" Certainly, if all came; but then they won't come. I tell
you all that come—aye, if they were as bad as devils, Christ would
receive them; if they had all sin and filthiness running into their
hearts as into a common sewer for the whole world, Christ would receive
them.
Another says, "I want to know about the rest of the people. May I go
out and tell them—Jesus Christ died for every one of you? May I
say—there is righteousness for everyone of you, there is life for every
one of you?" No; you may not. You may say—there is life for every man
that comes. But if you say there is life for one of those that do not
believe, you utter a dangerous lie. If you tell them Jesus Christ was
punished for their sins, and yet they will be lost, you tell a wilful
falsehood. To think that God could punish Christ and then punish them—I
wonder at your daring to have the impudence to say so!
June 24, 2016
Two books to help put our
problems into perspective
Ever
feel you are being overwhelmed by the trials and
tribulations of life? Here are two books to make us realize just how
small our problems are compared to what many faced long ago:
June 24, 2016
Foreigners Who Changed Japan -
Tanegashima and the Portuguese
I've
started an English-Japanese series called "Foreigners Who Changed
Japan" (日本を変えた外国人). The series starts out with the first Europeans who
in the mid-16th century arrived in Japan, landing on the island of
Tanegashima, and changing Japan’s history forever.
May 21, 2016
God's Comfort
"As one whom his mother comforteth, so will I comfort you; and ye shall
be comforted in Jerusalem." Isa 66:13
Excerpt from a sermon outline by Nicholson,
1862:
May 4, 2016
Christian history in Kumamoto
Updates and related info about the Kumamoto earthquakes can be found
daily in the news here in Japan. But Kumamoto was affected in another
very great way nearly 150 years ago when foreign teachers were brought
in to help modernize Japan. Among them was a godly man named Leroy L.
Janes.
Here is a chapter about those early years when Christianity first came
to Kumamoto, with one of the results being the formation of a group of
Japanese Christians who would have a huge influence on their country --
the Kumamoto Band (PDF file).
Sadly, the Janes' home was demolished in the earthquake, but hopefully
they will be able to salvage all of the important
historical articles that were displayed inside.
BEFORE:
AFTER:
March 25, 2016
Large Ships of Antiquity
VERY interesting piece by Larry Pierce (who developed one of the best Bible software programs
ever) on old ships and how huge they were. The following is from his website:
Each generation produces a fresh
crop of skeptics who are legends in their own mind. Charles Spurgeon
wryly observed about such a man in his day: “It is but the shallowness
of his mind that permits him to see the bottom of his knowledge.”
We should not be surprised that we are awash today with such so called
“experts”. The Apostle Peter warned us this would be the case. It has
become fashionable to scoff at anything biblical. Noah’s ark has never
failed to be the target of skeptics and the butt of many jokes.
Everyone knows you cannot build a boat as large as Noah did from wood,
even using today’s advanced technology. Only since ships were made of
steel, in the last hundred years or so, has man been able to build a
larger ship than Noah’s ark. These so called experts display their
ignorance of history in making such statements. Lets look at what ships
the ancients actually did build, some of which were almost as large as
the ark.
Rise in Technology of the
Ancients
In the writings of Pliny, we discovered the following table relating to
ships of antiquity. This documents the rapid advances the ancients made
in shipbuilding technology in just a few centuries. The time period in
the table covers from about the seventh century BC to the end of the
third century BC.
Vessel / Inventor / Authority / Approximate Time
double-banked / the Erythraens / Damastes / 7th c. BC
trireme / Aminocles of Corinth / Thucydides / 6th c.
BC
quadrireme / the Carthaginians / Aristotle / 5th c.
BC
quinquereme / the Salaminians / Mnesigiton / 4th c.
BC
galleys of six banks / the Syracusans / Xenagoras
up to ten banks / Alexander the Great / Mnesigiton
up to twelve / Ptolemy / Soter Philostephanus / 3rd
c. BC
up to fifteen / Demetrius, son of Antigonus /
Philostephanus
up to thirty / Ptolemy / Philadelphus Philostephanus
up to forty / Ptolemy / Philopator Tryphon
Philostephanus
When we think of warships of antiquity, we think of the tiny ships that
were shown in a movie like Ben Hur. They had about fifty or so men and
a single tier of oars. This was the best Hollywood could do on a
limited budget and reflects our evolutionary thinking that the ancients
were primitive compared to us. While we may flatter ourselves with our
supposed knowledge of ancient history, the actual facts, that come down
to us, tell us another story. From this table in Pliny, we can see a
rapid rise in technology over a few hundred years which culminated in a
ship of forty tiers of oars. (When we say forty tiers we mean forty
levels of rowers!) Now the question is, do we have any descriptions of
these ships so we can comprehend how large they really were?
Fortunately, we have a good description of one of the early third
century ships and an excellent description of the largest ship Pliny
lists.
The Leontifera
There was a naval battle in the Aegean Sea in 280 BC. The following is
Ussher’s description of what happened:
When Antigonus, surnamed Gonatas, the son of Demetrius Poliorcetes,
heard how Seleucus was murdered, he made an expedition into Macedonia.
He planned to get there before Ceraunus could with his army and naval
forces. However, Ceraunus had all Lysimachus’ fleet in readiness, and
set out and met him in a good battle formation at sea. In his navy,
ships were sent from Heraclea in Pontus, some of six, some of five
tiers of oars. These kinds of ships were called Aphracta. The largest
ship of all had eight tiers of oars and was called the Leontifera. She
was admired by all for her large size and exquisite construction. In
her were a hundred oars per tier, so that on each side there were eight
hundred rowers which made sixteen hundred in all. On the upper deck or
hatches there were twelve hundred fighting men who were under two
special commanders. When the battle began, Ceraunus won and Antigonus
was forced to flee with all his navy. In this fight, the ships from
Heraclea performed the best and among them the Leontifera did the best
of all … ”
We are not given the dimensions of this ship. However, for a hundred
men to sit on one tier of oars, each one would have to be at least
three feet apart which is the approximate distance between airline
seats. Has anyone ever complained of having too much space between
airline seats! Allowing for a bow and a stern, this ship could easily
have been four or five hundred feet long. (The next ship we describe
had fifty oars in a tier and was over four hundred feet long) If I was
in that battle in a ship, I definitely would not want to be in the path
of the business end of the Leontifera’s ramming prow. Also consider
that these battles were not fought in an afternoon! This ship could
have been at sea for a few days before and after this battle. With a
crew compliment of over three thousand men, think of the provisions
they would have to carry. They would need somewhere to sleep too!
Other Large Ships
Plutarch briefly describes the fleet which Demetrius built around 294
BC. These were the largest ships built at that time. Although Plutarch
gives no dimensions, he does state the following:
“Up until this time, no man had seen a ship of fifteen or sixteen banks
of oars. … However, in the ships of Demetrius their beauty
did not mar their fighting qualities, nor did the magnificence of their
equipment rob them of their usefulness, but they had a speed and
effectiveness which was more remarkable than their great size.”
The Grand-Daddy of Antiquity
Athenaeus gives us a detailed description of a very large warship.
Ptolemy Philopator (c. 244-205 BC) built a large warship. It was four
hundred and twenty feet long, fifty-seven feet wide and seventy-two
feet high to the top of her gunwale. From the top of her stern post to
the water line was seventy-nine and a half feet. It had four steering
oars forty-five feet long. It had forty tiers of oars. The oars on the
uppermost tier were fifty-seven feet long. The oars were counter
balanced with lead to make them easy to handle. It had a double bow and
a double stern and carried seven rams of which one was the leader and
the others were of gradually reducing size. It had twelve under-girders
nine hundred feet long. She was manned by four hundred sailors to
handle the rigging and the sails, four thousand rowers and two thousand
and eight hundred and fifty men in arms for a total of seven thousand
and fifty men. This ship was too large to be of much practical use.
Some things of interest about this ship. First, there are no forests
worth mentioning in Egypt. All the lumber had to be imported from
elsewhere, likely Lebanon. This ship had a crew compliment that was
almost twice as large as the compliment of the largest aircraft carrier
we have ever built! The size of the ship approximated the size of
Noah’s ark. Like Noah’s ark, it would have to carry provisions and
supplies for all these men. Oh for a time machine to go back and
capture this ship on film!
Athenaeus describes other very large ships and boats of antiquity. One
ship had a catapult designed by Archimedes that could hurl a hundred
and twenty pound stone over six hundred feet.
Conclusion
What should we learn from this?
Firstly, we are not as smart as we think we are! Just because we cannot
duplicate something that was done thousands of years ago, does not mean
the ancients could not do it either!
Secondly, we should learn from history. True history supports the Bible
and we have nothing to fear from the study of it. In fact, we have much
to learn. From these accounts we have given, it is obvious mankind was
able to build huge ships that rivaled Noah’s ark in size. We do not
know how it was done, but they did it!
The next time someone says that it is impossible for the ancients to
build a ship as large as Noah’s Ark, give the same reply Jesus gave
many times to his skeptics: “Have ye not read … ?”
March 16, 2016
Darwin and missions
A few excerpts from an 1888 book entitled (take a long breath!):
"The great value and success of foreign missions:
Proved by distinguished witnesses: being the testimony of diplomatic
ministers, consuls, naval officers, and scientific and other travelers
in heathen and Mohammedan countries; together with that of English
viceroys, governors, and military officers in India and in the British
Colonies: also leading facts and late statistics of the missions."
Interesting to note that Darwin supported missions, and considered the
work in Japan "the greatest wonder in the world." Darwin would have
done well to produce a book about missionary efforts and their
influence on the progress and "evolution" of nations.
March 9, 2016
Two Bridges
As we remember the life
and work of Jerry Bridges, there is another Bridges that must not
be forgotten. Spurgeon called Charles Bridges' Exposition "the best
work on Proverbs." Here is a portion from the 3rd chapter, full of
spiritual nourishment:
February 29, 2016
Spurgeon on sufficient grace
February 19, 2016
US and Japan Literacy
Interesting forward from FBIS
on "The Old Deluder Act." It is a blessing from the Lord that we know
how to read and write, for it is all biblically centered.
Japanese leaders understood the need for literacy among the populace as
well -- an interesting synopsis is here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/27vf5f/literacy_rates_in_premodern_japan_why_was/
Of special note is the influence of "Dutch Learning" (Rangaku)
-- even as our Pilgrim fathers benefited from the Dutch due to the
Reformation taking root there in a profound way (including Tyndale's
translation, though sadly martyred there!), so also did the Japanese,
by the Dutch sowing the seed of future Protestant evangelism through
literature. Quite a number of Japanese
were influenced, leading to great changes in Japan.
The Old Deluder Act and America’s
Literacy
From its inception, America was a highly literate society, and its
literacy was because of the Bible.
"The Puritans strongly supported education. Literacy, they believed, is
necessary in order to read and understand the Bible and its principles.
Literacy and education were also important to them because a civil
republican/democratic self-government require informed, knowledgeable
voters and representatives who understand the laws of the colony.
Literacy and education also provide communities with competent citizens
of various professions. The Puritans, therefore, wanted to spread
knowledge to everyone for the benefit of the community" (Angela
Kamrath, The Miracle of America).
Benjamin Rush, signer of the Declaration of Independence, said, "...
the only foundation for a useful education in a republic is to be laid
in religion. Without this, there can be no virtue, and without virtue
there can be no liberty, and liberty is the object and life of all
republican governments" (Of the Mode
of Education Proper in a Republic, 1798).
The Massachusetts School Law of 1642 required all children to be taught
to read and write by their parents or masters of apprenticeship. The
children were to be able "to read and understand the principles of
religion and the capital laws of this country."
The Old Deluder Satan Act of 1647 in the Massachusetts Bay Colony went
further, requiring that every town and community with over 50 families
set up schools and hire schoolmasters. The goal was so that "the old
deluder, Satan [would not] keep men from the knowledge of the
Scriptures." The particular fear was that the Catholic Church would be
able to deceive an illiterate people as she had been accustomed to
doing in Europe. The law began as follows: "It being one chief project
of that old deluder, Satan, to keep men from the knowledge of the
Scriptures, as in former times keeping them in an unknown tongue
[Latin], so in these later times by persuading from the use of tongues
[illiteracy], that so at least the true sense and meaning of the
Original might be clouded with false glosses of saint-seeming
deceivers; and that learning may not be buried in the graves of our
forefathers in Church and Commonwealth, the Lord assisting our
endeavours: it is therefore ordered by this Court and Authority
thereof; that every township in this jurisdiction, after the Lord hath
increased them to the number of fifty householders, shall then
forthwith appoint one within their town to each all such children as
shall resort to him to write and read..."
The New England Code of 1655 required that children be made "able duly
to read the Scriptures ... and in some competent measure to understand
the main grounds and principles of Christian Religion necessary to
salvation."
February 9, 2016
Islam and Roman Catholicism
"What an amazing prophecy is this!... a comfort to all the saints..."
Daniel 12 explained succinctly:
February 5, 2016
An allegory which I have never
forgotten -- A few ears of wheat
( George Everard,
"The Home of Bethany" 1873)
"He led them forth by the right way, that they might go to a city of
habitation." Psalm 107:7
Some years ago I heard an
allegory which I have never forgotten. It often comes back to me
when I think of the way in which the
Lord leads His people.
The fable runs that a few
ears
of wheat were growing in the corner of a field, and it was promised to
this wheat that it would one day be brought before the Queen. But
by-and-by the mower came with
his sharp scythe and cut the wheat, and feeling the sharpness of the
scythe, it said, "I shall never stand before the Queen!" Presently it
was laid in the wagon, and pressed and borne down by the other sheaves,
and again arose the cry of distress and despair. But, more than this,
it was laid on the threshing-floor, and the heavy flail came down upon it. It was
taken to the mill, and cut
and cut and cut; then it was kneaded into bread; and at last it was
placed in the hot burning oven.
Again and again was heard the cry of utter, hopeless despair. But at
length the promise was fulfilled, and the bread was placed on the
Queen's table!
There is a great spiritual truth beneath the fable. Christians are
God's wheat, sprung from the incorruptible seed of His Word, and from
the precious seed of the crucified, buried body of our Lord--and He
purposes that one day they shall stand before Him! But there needs much
preparation.
There comes the sharp scythe of bereavement--the
loss of child or parent or spouse.
There comes the oppressive burden of
care.
There comes the severe tribulation
(the very word signifies threshing), seasons of adversity and
disappointment.
There comes the mill, the
trial that utterly breaks us down, and fills the whole spirit with
distress.
There comes the hot furnace of agonizing
pain or fear.
All these are doing their appointed work, stirring up faith and prayer,
humbling to the very dust--and yet lifting up the Christian, by leading
him nearer to God, and enabling him at length to say, " It is good for me that I have been
afflicted!"
February 5, 2016
A mass of rubies, emeralds,
diamonds, in a nugget of gold
From Spurgeon's The Cheque Book of
the Bank of Faith:
"What can the Lord deny us after
giving us Jesus? ...for if there had been a limit anywhere, He would
have kept back His own Son."
February 4, 2016
To all us Kafirs...
In case you didn't know where you stand...
Every Non-Muslim Is a Kafir
The following is excerpted from THE
BIBLE AND ISLAM.
In light of today's news events, we do well to ask what the Bible says
about Islam. Islam controls a large part of the world and is on a
jihadic rampage that hasn't been seen in hundreds of years. This
far-reaching book describes Islam's beginning and history, the doctrine
of Allah, the Quran, Islam and salvation, the three stages of jihad,
the Koran's doctrine of abrogation, Islam and Judaism, Islam and
Christianity, Sharia law, jihad and world conquest, Islam and the slave
trade, Islam as a judgment on apostate Christianity and apostate
Israel, Islam's divisions and internecine hatred (Sunni vs. Shiite,
etc.), Islam as a preparation for the Antichrist, the Antichrist and
the Middle East problem, and Muslim nations in prophecy. The book
explains what is happening in the Middle East, and where these events
will ultimately lead. 160 pages. Available in print and as a free eBook
from www.wayoflife.org.
________________
According to Islam, humanity is divided into those who accept Muhammed
as the prophet of Allah and those who do not. Those who do not are the
Kafirs.
Kafir is the word that is
used in the Quran, and it is a strong word. It is the word for Allah's
enemies. It is the word for those who resist the truth. Kafirs are
unclean, evil, cursed, ignorant liars and partners of Satan. "It is
usually translated as unbeliever, but that translation is wrong. The
word unbeliever is neutral. But the attitude of the Quran towards
unbelievers is very negative. ... Kafir shows the common political
treatment of the Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, animist, atheist and
humanist. What is done to a pagan can be done to a Jew or any other
Kafir" ( A Simple Koran).
A Kafir is hated.
"They who dispute the signs of Allah without authority having reached
them are greatly hated by Allah and the believers. So Allah seals up
every arrogant, disdainful heart" (Surah 40:35).
A Kafir can be enslaved.
"Muhammed then said, 'Saed, give these people [the Jews of Medina] your
verdict.' Saed replied, 'Their soldiers should be beheaded and their
women and children should become slaves.' Mohammed, pleased with the
verdict, said, 'You have made a ruling that Allah or a king would
approve of'" (Sahih Al-Bukhari hadith 5,58,148).
A Kafir can be mocked.
"On that day the faithful will mock the Kafirs, while they sit on
bridal couches and watch them. Should not the Kafirs be paid back for
what they did?" (Surah 83:34).
A Kafir can be schemed against.
"They plot and scheme against you [Muhammed], and I [Allah] plot and
scheme against them. Therefore, deal calmly with the Kafirs and leaven
them alone for awhile" (Surah 86:15).
A Kafir can be deceived.
"Mohammed asked, 'Who will kill Ka'b, the enemy of Allah and Mohammed?
Bin Maslama rose and responded, 'O Mohammed! Would it please you if I
killed him?' Mohammed answered, 'Yes.' Bin Maslama then said, 'Give me
permission to deceive him with lies so that my plan will succeed.'
Mohammed replied, 'You may speak falsely to him'" (Sahih Al-Bukhari
hadith 5,59,369).
A Kafir can be terrorized.
"Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, 'I will be with you. Give
strength to the believers. I will send terror into the Kafirs' hearts,
cut off their heads and even the tips of their fingers" (Surah 8:12).
A Kafir can be beheaded.
"When you encounter the Kafirs on the battlefield, cut off their heads
until you have thoroughly defeated them and then take the prisoners and
tie them up firmly" (Surah 47:4).
A Kafir can be annihilated.
"So the Kafirs were annihilated. All praise be to Allah, the Lord of
the worlds!" (Surah 6:45).
A Kafir can be killed.
"If they do not keep away from you or offer you peace or withdraw their
hostilities, then seize them and kill them wherever they are. We give
you complete authority over them" (Surah 4:91).
A Kafir can be crucified and his
hands and feet hacked off.
"The only reward for those who war against Allah and His messengers and
strive to commit mischief on the earth is that they will be slain or
crucified, have their alternate hands and feet cut off, or be banished
from the land. This will be their disgrace in this world, and a great
torment shall be theirs in the next except those who repent before you
overpower them. Know that Allah is forgiving and merciful" (Surah 5:33).
A Kafir can be made war on and
humiliated.
"Make war on those who have received the Scriptures but do not believe
in Allah or in the Last Day. They do not forbid what Allah and
His Messenger have forbidden. The Christians and Jews do not follow the
religion of truth until they submit and pay the poll tax [jizya], and
they are humiliated" (Surah 9:29).
A Kafir cannot be befriended.
"Believers should not take Kafirs as friends in preference to other
believers. Those who do this will have none of Allah's protection and
will only have themselves as guards. Allah warns you to fear Him for
all will return to Him" (Surah 3:28).
A Kafir is not to treated with
kindness.
"Oh, you who believe, do not take My enemy and yours for friends by
showing them kindness" (Surah 60:1).
January 25, 2016
Beware of Science Fiction
From The Way of Life:
There
is an intimate connection between evolution and
science fiction, which is not surprising since both deal with a world
without God. Oh, there might be "a god," a "force," but it is
definitely not the God of the Bible. The prominent names in science
fiction are atheists and many of them were also prominent in the field
of Darwinian science.
Take CARL SAGAN (1934-1996), for example,
whose best-selling sci-fi novel Contact was made into a
movie. Sagan was one of the high priests of atheistic evolution. In his
novel he has the main character debating two preachers and saying,
"There is no compelling evidence that God exists." In 1997 Sagan said,
"I share the view of a hero of mine, Albert Einstein: 'I cannot
conceive of a god who rewards and punishes his creatures or has a will
of the kind that we experience in ourselves.' Neither can I--nor would
I want to--conceive of an individual that survives his physical death.
Let feeble souls, from fear or absurd egotism, cherish such thoughts'" (Parade,
March 10, 1997).
Consider another prominent name in Sci-Fi, ISAAC
ASIMOV (1920-1992). In a 1982 interview he said, "Emotionally,
I am an atheist. I don't have the evidence to prove that God doesn't
exist, but I so strongly suspect he doesn't that I don't want to waste
my time" (Paul Kurtz, "An Interview with Isaac Asimov on Science and
the Bible," Free Inquiry, Spring 1982, p. 9).
Consider ROBERT HEINLEIN (1907-1988),
called "the dean of science fiction writers." He rejected the Bible and
promoted "free sex." His book "Stranger in a Strange Land" is
considered "the unofficial bible of the hippie movement." Heinlein was
a nudist and practiced "polyamory." He promoted agnosticism in his
sci-fi books.
Consider ARTHUR CLARKE (1917-2008), author
of many sci-fi works, including 2001: A Space Odyssey. Clarke
promoted evolutionary pantheism. He told a Sri Lankan newspaper, "I
don't believe in God or an afterlife" ("Life Beyond 2001: Exclusive
Interview with Arthur C. Clarke," The Island, Dec. 20, 2000).
In the instructions he left for his funeral in March 2008 he said,
"Absolutely no religious rites of any kind, relating to any religious
faith, should be associated with my funeral."
Consider KURT VONNEGUT (1922-2007). He was
an atheist, and as an honorary president of the American Humanist
Association he subscribed to its code which "does not accept
supernatural views of reality."
Consider GENE RODDENBERRY (1921-1991),
creator of Star Trek. He was an agnostic and humanist who
envisioned a world in which "everyone is an atheist and better for it"
(Brannon Braga, "Every Religion Has a Mythology," International Atheist
Conference, June 24, 2006).
Consider H. G. WELLS (1866-1946), author of
such science fiction classics as The Time Machine, War
of the Worlds, and The First Man on the Moon. He
converted to Darwinism as a college student under the influence of
Thomas Huxley ("Darwin's Bulldog") and spent the rest of his life
preaching atheism and an extreme form of eugenics. Wells' illegitimate
son, Anthony West, said that after studying under Huxley, "Darwinian
evolution inspired Wells' writings forever after." In The Outline
of History, Wells described man's supposed rise from the apes,
describing Neanderthal as "stooped forward and could not hold his head
erect, as all living men do; he was chinless and perhaps incapable of
speech ... he was, indeed, not quite of the human species." This was as
mythical as his science fiction writings. Wells embraced the modern
culture of death, advocating sterilization, abortion, infanticide,
suicide, and euthanasia for the "inferior," meaning the diseased, the
deformed, the mentally ill, alcoholics, criminals, even the "helpless."
Not only was he in favor of killing individuals that he considered
inferior but entire races, as well. He said, "... there is only one
sane and logical thing to be done with a really inferior race and that
is to exterminate it" (Diane Paul, Controlling Human Heredity,
1995, p. 75). He said "those swarms of blacks, and brown, and
dirty-white, and yellow people ... will have to go" (Martin Gardner, Fads
and Fallacies in the Name of Science, 1957, p. xi). Wells urged
society to have "no pity and less benevolence" toward the inferior. He
wanted to create a master race through Darwinian survival of the
fittest. He wasn't without a conscience, though. He advocated
administering opiates to those who were to be killed! In his later
years he backed away from killing the unfit, but he continued to call
for their sterilization. Wells called the God of the Bible "absurd."
Not surprisingly, he was an early advocate of "free love" and lived a
debauched moral life. He was a serial adulterer, even committing
adultery with the daughters of his friends. One of his partners in
adultery was fellow atheist and eugenist Margaret Sanger, founder of
Planned Parenthood. He died an "infinitely frustrated" and broken man,
with no hope for the future, neither for himself nor for the human race.
Consider RAY BRADBURY (1920-2012), author
of Fahrenheit 451 and the Martian Chronicles.
Bradbury grew up in a Baptist home, but he describes himself as
"delicatessen religionist." He is particularly enamored with Buddhism
and Eastern religion, even calling himself a "Zen Buddhist." He is a
pantheist and an evolutionist. He considers Jesus a wise prophet, like
Buddha and Confucius, a man who became christ through self effort
("Sci-fi Legend Ray Bradbury on God," CNN, August 2, 2010). He claims
that when it comes to God, "none of us know anything." He says that man
must leave earth for salvation. "We must move into the universe.
Mankind must save itself. We must escape the danger of war and
politics. We must become astronauts and go out into the universe and
discover the God in ourselves."
Consider TERRY PRATCHETT (1948-2015) a
science fiction/fantasy author who sold more than 85 million books
worldwide in 37 languages. The top-selling UK author in 1996, he
was best known for the Discword series. Though his influence
was large, he was an atheist. He described himself as a humanist and
was a Distinguished Supporter of the British Humanist Association. In
his youth he was addicted to reading science fiction and attending
science fiction conventions. His favorite authors included H.G. Wells.
Pratchett was a proponent of euthanasia, and in 2011 he presented a BBC
television documentary Terry Pratchett: Choosing to Die.
Three years later, he died at age 66, possibly by assisted suicide. A
couple of years earlier, he said that he had come to believe that "on
the other side of physics, there just may be the ordered structure from
which everything flows" (Rob Davies, "Terry Pratchett hints he may have
found God," Daily Telegraph, June 8, 2008). He was quick to
say, "This is not about God, but somewhere around there is where gods
come from" (Front Row, BBC Radio 4, September 1, 2008).
Consider THOMAS DISCH (1940-2008), author
of The Genocides, Camp Concentration, 334, and On Wings
of Song. His last book was The Word of God, in which he
pretended to speak from God's perspective "to score points on the
absurdity of hell and similar numinous postulates." He blasphemously
said, "One of the wonderful things about being God is you can say such
nonsense and it's all true" (The New York Sun, Jul. 8, 2008,
Obituaries, p. 6). He knows better now, having committed suicide a few
days after the publication of The Word of God.
Other
science fiction writers and promoters who are atheists include Forrest
Ackerman (1916-2008), Douglas Adams (1952-2001), James Aaron (b. 1973),
J.G. Ballard (1930-2009), Ian Banks (1954-2013), Gregory Benford (b.
1941), John W. Campbell (1910-1971), Angela Carter (1940-1992), Edmund
Cooper (1926-1982), Greg Egan (b. 1961), Harlan Ellison (b. 1934), Tom
Flynn (b. 1955), Harry Harrison (1925-2012), Ursula LeGuin (b. 1929),
Stanislaw Lem (1921-2006), China Mieville (b. 1972), Larry Niven (b.
1938), Phillip Pullman (b. 1946), Robert Sawyer (b. 1960), Bruce
Sterling (b. 1954), Sean Williams (b. 1967).
Sci-fi
arose in the late 19th and early 20th century as a product of an
evolutionary worldview that denies the Almighty Creator. In fact,
Darwinian evolution is the pre-eminent science fiction.
The intimate association between evolutionary "science" and science
fiction was highlighted when Nature magazine was awarded the European
Science Fiction Society's Best Publisher award in 2005 for the "Future"
series of short science fiction articles that Henry Gee instigated in
1999. A collection of these was published in Futures from Nature in
2008. |
January 25, 2016
Gutenberg, Islam, and the
printing press
ISLAM AND THE PRINTING PRESS
(Friday Church News Notes, January 22, 2016, www.wayoflife.org,
fbns@wayoflife.org,
866-295-4143)
Printing by moveable type was invented in 1452, and by 1500 an
estimated 20 million books and materials had been printed (Christopher
Anderson, Annals of the English Bible, I, p. lx). The
publication of Bibles exploded. The first printed book was a complete
Latin Bible in 1455. By 1520, no less than 199 editions of the entire
Bible had appeared, and this was just the bare beginning of the Bible
printing revolution. Suddenly, for the first time in church history,
common people could afford to own a Bible and they were eager to do so.
The printing press was little used by Muslims, though.
According to Islam, Arabic is the holy language and the translation of
the Quran is discouraged. Historically, Muslim nations have not been
friends of printing. Consider the Ottoman Empire (1299-1923). The
Ottomans "were no friends to public education, independent news media
and the printed word" ("Arab Media: The Web 2.0 Revolution," Carnegie
Reporter, Fall 2008). Books and printed matter were unknown in
Turkish and Arabic before the end of the 18th century, and prior to
1840, "an average of only eleven books a year were published in the
capital of Istanbul" (Ibid.).
Jews, Greeks, and Armenians had printing presses in the Ottoman Empire,
but they were not allowed to print materials in Turkish or Arabic. In
1900, 90% of Muslims were illiterate. In 2008, about 35% of Muslims
(50% of women) were still illiterate. Only 350 books are translated
into Arabic annually. Saudi Arabia did not have a high school until
after 1930 and still has only 250 public libraries to serve 26 million
people (and until 2006, females were not allowed to hold readers
cards). There are about 550 universities among the 57 Muslim nations of
the Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC) compared with more than
5,700 in the U.S. and 8,400 in India.
|
January 21, 2016
Good comments on Daniel 1
Remember this was written nearly 200 years ago!
"It is painful to reflect how
often public education tends to corrupt the principles and morals... It
is much to the praise of young people not to covet or seek the delights
of sense... Conscientious temperance will always to do more..."
January 13, 2016
WWJD coined by Spurgeon?
From Grace Gems:
WWJD
( Charles
Spurgeon, "The Fair Portrait of a Saint" 1880)
"My feet have closely followed His steps--I have kept to His way
without turning aside." Job 23:11
A very beautiful motto is hung up in our classroom at the Stockwell
Orphanage, "What would Jesus do?" Not only may children take it as
their guide, but all of us may do the same, whatever our age.
"What would Jesus do?"
If you desire to know what you ought to do under any circumstances,
imagine Jesus to be in that position and then think, "What would Jesus
do? For what Jesus would do--that ought I to do."
This principle unties the knot of all moral difficulty in the most
practical way, and does it so simply that no great wit or wisdom will
be needed.
"I have set you an example that you should do as I have done for you."
John 13:15
"Christ, who suffered for you, is your example. Follow in His steps." 1
Peter 2:21
"Whoever claims to live in Him, must walk as Jesus did." 1 John 2:6
January 4, 2016
Importance of Notetaking:
What a young man's notetaking produced that changed the world of
commentaries
That young man was Matthew Henry, probably the most widely read of all
Bible commentators. From an old encyclopedia:
|